Letter to the Hon. Jeff Sessions, Attorney General, the Hon. Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General, the Hon. Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General, and the Hon. John Gore, Acting Assistant Attorney General - DOJ to Produce Documents that May Show Coordination with Trump Voter Fraud Commission

Letter

Dear Attorney General Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, Associate Attorney General Brand, and Acting Assistant Attorney General Gore:

We write to follow up on our previous inquiries regarding the Department of Justice's ("DOJ") involvement with the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity ("the Commission").

On July 11, we wrote to request information regarding DOJ's June 28 letter to forty-four states requesting information about state-level procedures for maintaining voter registration lists. We wrote again on September 26, regarding documents that showed DOJ leadership's apparent role in selecting the members of the Commission. We have not yet received responses to these letters.

Since then, additional documents have come to light evidencing the Department's involvement with the Commission's workings. This is concerning, particularly in light of another recent court production showing Commission Vice Chair Kris Kobach's plans to dismantle the National Voter Registration Act.[1] As we have written before, it would be a low moment for the Department to have been a facilitator of Mr. Kobach's efforts to suppress voter access by perpetuating the myth of widespread voter fraud.

In litigation against the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Commission recently produced a Vaughn index to justify withholding from FOIA production hundreds of Commission-related documents.[2] While we have reasons to question the Commission's bases for those non-disclosures even in the context of private party litigation, FOIA exemptions are not a basis for the executive branch to shield documents from Congressional oversight. From the Vaughn index, it is clear that the Department is in possession of, and indeed has already collected, documents responsive to our earlier requests.

These include at least the following entries on the Commission's Vaughn index:

May 15, 2017: "email exchange re: Chicago board of election" (DOJ official to Commissioner Christy McCormick) (#541)
June 15, 2017: "email about setting up a time to speak" (Andrew Kossack, the Commission's designated federal officer, to DOJ official) (#687)
July 5-6, 2017: "email exchange discussing voting issue with attachment" (DOJ Official to McCormick) (#544)
Aug. 1-2, 2017: "email chain and planner setting a time for a call" (Kossack to Department of Homeland Security Official and Staff, DOJ) (#738 & 741)
Aug. 22, 2017: "email re: collecting data from non-state entities" (Kossack to DOJ) (#748)
Sept. 5, 2017: "email forwarding link to news article" (DOJ official to McCormick) (#564)
Sept. 6, 11, 2017: "emails exchange discussing Chicago voting issue" (Third party to McCormick, DOJ official) (#565)
Sept. 15, 2017: "email exchange re: sending materials for litigation index" (Kossack to DOJ, King) (#343)
Undated: Litigation documents and emails with DOJ (#778)
While some of these entries might be related to the Department's representation of the Commission in litigation, other entries appear to show that the Department was coordinating with the Commission about data collection and other voting issues. If these communications concern ongoing or contemplated cases or investigations in the Civil Rights Division, they could violate the Administration's policy limiting contacts between the White House and the Department.[3] Full disclosure of these documents is necessary for Congress to provide appropriate oversight on this issue.

The Vaughn index shows the Department has records of these communications in its possession and should be able to produce them to us without further delay. Accordingly, we respectfully ask that the Department immediately produce records of any and all communications between Department of Justice or Civil Rights Division leadership[4] and the White House, the Office of the Vice President, the White House Counsel's Office, the Commission, or any of the Commission's members or representatives, regarding the Commission or its work, either before or after its formation.

We also repeat our request that the Department respond immediately to the outstanding requests in our above-referenced July 11, 2017 and September 26, 2017 letters.